Swan Valley Planning Committee

On January 29th, the Board of County Commissioners voted affirmatively on the resolution of intent to adopt the Swan Valley Neighborhood Plan. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a second hearing on the final plan adoption at 2 p.m. on Thursday, February 12, 2026 at the Sophie Moise Room, Missoula County Courthouse, 200 W Broadway in Missoula.

In summary, the plan is still in the adoption process and public comment is still being accepted.

The adoption process is described below:

Swan Valley Community Council: an affirmative recommendation was made at the November 18th, 2025 meeting
Missoula Consolidated Planning Board: an affirmative recommendation was made at the hearing on December 16th, 2025
Board of County Commissioners: an affirmative vote on the resolution of intent to adopt occurred on January 29th. The 2nd meeting is scheduled for February 12th at 2 p.m. on Thursday, February 12, 2026 at the Sophie Moise Room, Missoula County Courthouse, 200 W Broadway in Missoula.

Feedback on the plan is important, please provide comments and questions below in the "Questions" section.

This webpage is a place for the community to track the activities of the planning process, find resources and keep track of meeting times and dates. Find the agenda, meeting times, and dates for the Planning Process under the "key dates" widget on the right-hand side.

The Swan Valley Planning Committee was a sub-committee of the Swan Valley Community Council tasked with exploring ideas, opportunities, and applications for land use planning tools that could be developed to address residents’ concerns around growth in the Swan Valley.

Members of the Planning Committee were appointed by the Swan Valley Community Council on Nov. 21, 2023. They were directed to explore land use issues the community is most concerned about, and what planning tools might best address those issues. The Planning Committee determined to pursue updating the 1996 Swan Valley Neighborhood plan, which was approved by the Swan Valley Community Council. The Community Council disbanded the Planning Committee by vote on October, 21st 2025 after presenting the draft neighborhood plan.

Planning Committee Members: Helene Michael, Luke Lamar, Grace Siloti, Gary Lazarowski, Joan McGuire, Marcia Tapp (non-voting member), Tom Parker, Jon Simon, Christian Spilker, Len Kobylenski, Christine Straube (non-voting member), Bill Lombardi, Jenny Rorher (non-voting member and note taker).

In summary, the plan is still in the adoption process and public comment is still being accepted.

The adoption process is described below:

Swan Valley Community Council: an affirmative recommendation was made at the November 18th, 2025 meeting
Missoula Consolidated Planning Board: an affirmative recommendation was made at the hearing on December 16th, 2025
Board of County Commissioners: an affirmative vote on the resolution of intent to adopt occurred on January 29th. The 2nd meeting is scheduled for February 12th at 2 p.m. on Thursday, February 12, 2026 at the Sophie Moise Room, Missoula County Courthouse, 200 W Broadway in Missoula.

Feedback on the plan is important, please provide comments and questions below in the "Questions" section.

Have a question about what the Swan Valley Planning Committee is working on? Ask us!

We will try to respond within ten business days.

Share No zoning period on Facebook Share No zoning period on Twitter Share No zoning period on Linkedin Email No zoning period link

No zoning period

Wanda asked 12 days ago

Thank you for your comment.
Share Please remove Zoning from the plan. on Facebook Share Please remove Zoning from the plan. on Twitter Share Please remove Zoning from the plan. on Linkedin Email Please remove Zoning from the plan. link

Please remove Zoning from the plan.

dark asked 12 days ago

Thank you for your comment.
Share As per the petitioners of Condon Community that has been legally presented at the meeting. Remove all zoning regulations. In Montana, under MCA 76-1-604, the qualified electors of an area covered by a growth policy have the power to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy through a petition process. Key details of this process include: Signature Threshold: A petition to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy must contain signatures of 15% of the qualified electors in the area covered by the policy. Process: While governing bodies (such as county commissioners or city councils) typically adopt or amend growth policies by resolution, this statutory provision allows citizens to bypass or overturn council decisions via this initiative or referendum process. Applicable Procedures: The procedures for these initiatives or referendums are generally governed by the provisions of Title 7, chapter 5, part 1. This statute specifically enables local control over land use planning by ensuring that residents can directly influence the adoption or repeal of a growth policy. Next time follow what the people want! on Facebook Share As per the petitioners of Condon Community that has been legally presented at the meeting. Remove all zoning regulations. In Montana, under MCA 76-1-604, the qualified electors of an area covered by a growth policy have the power to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy through a petition process. Key details of this process include: Signature Threshold: A petition to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy must contain signatures of 15% of the qualified electors in the area covered by the policy. Process: While governing bodies (such as county commissioners or city councils) typically adopt or amend growth policies by resolution, this statutory provision allows citizens to bypass or overturn council decisions via this initiative or referendum process. Applicable Procedures: The procedures for these initiatives or referendums are generally governed by the provisions of Title 7, chapter 5, part 1. This statute specifically enables local control over land use planning by ensuring that residents can directly influence the adoption or repeal of a growth policy. Next time follow what the people want! on Twitter Share As per the petitioners of Condon Community that has been legally presented at the meeting. Remove all zoning regulations. In Montana, under MCA 76-1-604, the qualified electors of an area covered by a growth policy have the power to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy through a petition process. Key details of this process include: Signature Threshold: A petition to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy must contain signatures of 15% of the qualified electors in the area covered by the policy. Process: While governing bodies (such as county commissioners or city councils) typically adopt or amend growth policies by resolution, this statutory provision allows citizens to bypass or overturn council decisions via this initiative or referendum process. Applicable Procedures: The procedures for these initiatives or referendums are generally governed by the provisions of Title 7, chapter 5, part 1. This statute specifically enables local control over land use planning by ensuring that residents can directly influence the adoption or repeal of a growth policy. Next time follow what the people want! on Linkedin Email As per the petitioners of Condon Community that has been legally presented at the meeting. Remove all zoning regulations. In Montana, under MCA 76-1-604, the qualified electors of an area covered by a growth policy have the power to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy through a petition process. Key details of this process include: Signature Threshold: A petition to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy must contain signatures of 15% of the qualified electors in the area covered by the policy. Process: While governing bodies (such as county commissioners or city councils) typically adopt or amend growth policies by resolution, this statutory provision allows citizens to bypass or overturn council decisions via this initiative or referendum process. Applicable Procedures: The procedures for these initiatives or referendums are generally governed by the provisions of Title 7, chapter 5, part 1. This statute specifically enables local control over land use planning by ensuring that residents can directly influence the adoption or repeal of a growth policy. Next time follow what the people want! link

As per the petitioners of Condon Community that has been legally presented at the meeting. Remove all zoning regulations. In Montana, under MCA 76-1-604, the qualified electors of an area covered by a growth policy have the power to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy through a petition process. Key details of this process include: Signature Threshold: A petition to initiate, revise, or repeal a growth policy must contain signatures of 15% of the qualified electors in the area covered by the policy. Process: While governing bodies (such as county commissioners or city councils) typically adopt or amend growth policies by resolution, this statutory provision allows citizens to bypass or overturn council decisions via this initiative or referendum process. Applicable Procedures: The procedures for these initiatives or referendums are generally governed by the provisions of Title 7, chapter 5, part 1. This statute specifically enables local control over land use planning by ensuring that residents can directly influence the adoption or repeal of a growth policy. Next time follow what the people want!

Edward Klassen asked 12 days ago

The Neighborhood Plan is not zoning and zoning is not being adopted at this time.
Share The subcommittee didn't have the Quran as required by law thus no legal vote was taken. They had 19 meeting that failed to post agendas in a timely manner or have a proper legal quorum! Pplease provide the law that allows you to use documents for illicit illegal Null and void meetings. on Facebook Share The subcommittee didn't have the Quran as required by law thus no legal vote was taken. They had 19 meeting that failed to post agendas in a timely manner or have a proper legal quorum! Pplease provide the law that allows you to use documents for illicit illegal Null and void meetings. on Twitter Share The subcommittee didn't have the Quran as required by law thus no legal vote was taken. They had 19 meeting that failed to post agendas in a timely manner or have a proper legal quorum! Pplease provide the law that allows you to use documents for illicit illegal Null and void meetings. on Linkedin Email The subcommittee didn't have the Quran as required by law thus no legal vote was taken. They had 19 meeting that failed to post agendas in a timely manner or have a proper legal quorum! Pplease provide the law that allows you to use documents for illicit illegal Null and void meetings. link

The subcommittee didn't have the Quran as required by law thus no legal vote was taken. They had 19 meeting that failed to post agendas in a timely manner or have a proper legal quorum! Pplease provide the law that allows you to use documents for illicit illegal Null and void meetings.

Edward Klassen asked 12 days ago

The Quran is not required by law.
Share You stated "The Swan Valley Planning Committee was disbanded on October 21st, 2025. A meeting of private citizens does not require meeting minutes" The private meeting in your office and at the Swan Valley Conditions constitute government meetings. Community Council members can not have meetings that violate the Sunshine Act. Two of the council members sat with former subcommittee members! That is a clear violation of the Open Meeting Laws! Secondly you stated you were at all the meetings. Did you attend that meeting? on Facebook Share You stated "The Swan Valley Planning Committee was disbanded on October 21st, 2025. A meeting of private citizens does not require meeting minutes" The private meeting in your office and at the Swan Valley Conditions constitute government meetings. Community Council members can not have meetings that violate the Sunshine Act. Two of the council members sat with former subcommittee members! That is a clear violation of the Open Meeting Laws! Secondly you stated you were at all the meetings. Did you attend that meeting? on Twitter Share You stated "The Swan Valley Planning Committee was disbanded on October 21st, 2025. A meeting of private citizens does not require meeting minutes" The private meeting in your office and at the Swan Valley Conditions constitute government meetings. Community Council members can not have meetings that violate the Sunshine Act. Two of the council members sat with former subcommittee members! That is a clear violation of the Open Meeting Laws! Secondly you stated you were at all the meetings. Did you attend that meeting? on Linkedin Email You stated "The Swan Valley Planning Committee was disbanded on October 21st, 2025. A meeting of private citizens does not require meeting minutes" The private meeting in your office and at the Swan Valley Conditions constitute government meetings. Community Council members can not have meetings that violate the Sunshine Act. Two of the council members sat with former subcommittee members! That is a clear violation of the Open Meeting Laws! Secondly you stated you were at all the meetings. Did you attend that meeting? link

You stated "The Swan Valley Planning Committee was disbanded on October 21st, 2025. A meeting of private citizens does not require meeting minutes" The private meeting in your office and at the Swan Valley Conditions constitute government meetings. Community Council members can not have meetings that violate the Sunshine Act. Two of the council members sat with former subcommittee members! That is a clear violation of the Open Meeting Laws! Secondly you stated you were at all the meetings. Did you attend that meeting?

Edward Klassen asked 12 days ago

In the December 29^th message, it was stated that “Grace Siloti Luke Lamar, Jon Simon, Christine Straube” attended a meeting. Only one of those people is a community council member. No sunshine laws have been violated based on that information. Staff have not hosted or attended any meetings with the Community Council or Swan Valley Connections.
Share I have presented your agencies the missing meet minutes. You have not posted them as required by law. Please do so! on Facebook Share I have presented your agencies the missing meet minutes. You have not posted them as required by law. Please do so! on Twitter Share I have presented your agencies the missing meet minutes. You have not posted them as required by law. Please do so! on Linkedin Email I have presented your agencies the missing meet minutes. You have not posted them as required by law. Please do so! link

I have presented your agencies the missing meet minutes. You have not posted them as required by law. Please do so!

Edward Klassen asked 12 days ago

All available meeting minutes are posted on the Missoula County Voice page or at the Condon Library.
Share Montana law does not allow an official public meeting notice to be posted only on a private Facebook message page, as public notices must be accessible to everyone. Private messages are inherently not public and therefore violate the spirit and letter of the law requiring adequate public notice and participation. Montana Public Meeting Notice Requirements Public Accessibility: Montana's "Sunshine Laws" require that all public or governmental body meetings must be open to the public, and notice must be provided to ensure public participation. Adequate Notice: Agencies are required to develop procedures to ensure adequate notice of meetings. Notice should be posted a minimum of 72 hours in advance for state boards, and generally at least 48 business hours for local governments. Many of the meeting failed to have address this requirement! Official Posting Locations: Official notice typically involves publication in a newspaper of general circulation, posting on the agency's official website, the state's electronic calendar, or in designated public places. Grace started she place it on the Swan Valley Community Facebook page. A private page can not be proper notice! Social Media Use: Public agencies may use their official, public social media pages to supplement official notice, but the communication on the site is public and subject to disclosure laws. An agency cannot use a private, invite-only forum as the sole or primary method of official communication, as this excludes the general public. Deliberation Rules: The law also prohibits a quorum of a public body from deliberating on official business outside of a properly posted public meeting, whether in person, via email, or via private social media messages. Requirements have not been met. Re-do all public bodies work that was based on this highlighted illegal meetings. on Facebook Share Montana law does not allow an official public meeting notice to be posted only on a private Facebook message page, as public notices must be accessible to everyone. Private messages are inherently not public and therefore violate the spirit and letter of the law requiring adequate public notice and participation. Montana Public Meeting Notice Requirements Public Accessibility: Montana's "Sunshine Laws" require that all public or governmental body meetings must be open to the public, and notice must be provided to ensure public participation. Adequate Notice: Agencies are required to develop procedures to ensure adequate notice of meetings. Notice should be posted a minimum of 72 hours in advance for state boards, and generally at least 48 business hours for local governments. Many of the meeting failed to have address this requirement! Official Posting Locations: Official notice typically involves publication in a newspaper of general circulation, posting on the agency's official website, the state's electronic calendar, or in designated public places. Grace started she place it on the Swan Valley Community Facebook page. A private page can not be proper notice! Social Media Use: Public agencies may use their official, public social media pages to supplement official notice, but the communication on the site is public and subject to disclosure laws. An agency cannot use a private, invite-only forum as the sole or primary method of official communication, as this excludes the general public. Deliberation Rules: The law also prohibits a quorum of a public body from deliberating on official business outside of a properly posted public meeting, whether in person, via email, or via private social media messages. Requirements have not been met. Re-do all public bodies work that was based on this highlighted illegal meetings. on Twitter Share Montana law does not allow an official public meeting notice to be posted only on a private Facebook message page, as public notices must be accessible to everyone. Private messages are inherently not public and therefore violate the spirit and letter of the law requiring adequate public notice and participation. Montana Public Meeting Notice Requirements Public Accessibility: Montana's "Sunshine Laws" require that all public or governmental body meetings must be open to the public, and notice must be provided to ensure public participation. Adequate Notice: Agencies are required to develop procedures to ensure adequate notice of meetings. Notice should be posted a minimum of 72 hours in advance for state boards, and generally at least 48 business hours for local governments. Many of the meeting failed to have address this requirement! Official Posting Locations: Official notice typically involves publication in a newspaper of general circulation, posting on the agency's official website, the state's electronic calendar, or in designated public places. Grace started she place it on the Swan Valley Community Facebook page. A private page can not be proper notice! Social Media Use: Public agencies may use their official, public social media pages to supplement official notice, but the communication on the site is public and subject to disclosure laws. An agency cannot use a private, invite-only forum as the sole or primary method of official communication, as this excludes the general public. Deliberation Rules: The law also prohibits a quorum of a public body from deliberating on official business outside of a properly posted public meeting, whether in person, via email, or via private social media messages. Requirements have not been met. Re-do all public bodies work that was based on this highlighted illegal meetings. on Linkedin Email Montana law does not allow an official public meeting notice to be posted only on a private Facebook message page, as public notices must be accessible to everyone. Private messages are inherently not public and therefore violate the spirit and letter of the law requiring adequate public notice and participation. Montana Public Meeting Notice Requirements Public Accessibility: Montana's "Sunshine Laws" require that all public or governmental body meetings must be open to the public, and notice must be provided to ensure public participation. Adequate Notice: Agencies are required to develop procedures to ensure adequate notice of meetings. Notice should be posted a minimum of 72 hours in advance for state boards, and generally at least 48 business hours for local governments. Many of the meeting failed to have address this requirement! Official Posting Locations: Official notice typically involves publication in a newspaper of general circulation, posting on the agency's official website, the state's electronic calendar, or in designated public places. Grace started she place it on the Swan Valley Community Facebook page. A private page can not be proper notice! Social Media Use: Public agencies may use their official, public social media pages to supplement official notice, but the communication on the site is public and subject to disclosure laws. An agency cannot use a private, invite-only forum as the sole or primary method of official communication, as this excludes the general public. Deliberation Rules: The law also prohibits a quorum of a public body from deliberating on official business outside of a properly posted public meeting, whether in person, via email, or via private social media messages. Requirements have not been met. Re-do all public bodies work that was based on this highlighted illegal meetings. link

Montana law does not allow an official public meeting notice to be posted only on a private Facebook message page, as public notices must be accessible to everyone. Private messages are inherently not public and therefore violate the spirit and letter of the law requiring adequate public notice and participation. Montana Public Meeting Notice Requirements Public Accessibility: Montana's "Sunshine Laws" require that all public or governmental body meetings must be open to the public, and notice must be provided to ensure public participation. Adequate Notice: Agencies are required to develop procedures to ensure adequate notice of meetings. Notice should be posted a minimum of 72 hours in advance for state boards, and generally at least 48 business hours for local governments. Many of the meeting failed to have address this requirement! Official Posting Locations: Official notice typically involves publication in a newspaper of general circulation, posting on the agency's official website, the state's electronic calendar, or in designated public places. Grace started she place it on the Swan Valley Community Facebook page. A private page can not be proper notice! Social Media Use: Public agencies may use their official, public social media pages to supplement official notice, but the communication on the site is public and subject to disclosure laws. An agency cannot use a private, invite-only forum as the sole or primary method of official communication, as this excludes the general public. Deliberation Rules: The law also prohibits a quorum of a public body from deliberating on official business outside of a properly posted public meeting, whether in person, via email, or via private social media messages. Requirements have not been met. Re-do all public bodies work that was based on this highlighted illegal meetings.

Edward Klassen asked 16 days ago

Thank you for your comment.
Share First and foremost ''I am speaking for myself in my personal capacity on this matter" I believe we should look at the 2018 plan and why it failed. It appears the 2018 map covers areas outside the Condon Community Council's jurisdiction also improperly posting meeting times and minimum dates appears 2 and 3 day notice of meetings throut the entire process. The main violates are utilizing meeting materials from meeting with no quorum seem to be the case again here. My main question is are we going down the same road. Simple answer is YES! The 10.4 mile and at most has 285 people. As I see it we should address this issue with disclosure of the mailing list. Also before we move forward with documents from Null andvoid meeting materials be advised this is a crimeit Montana. None residents of this area can not vote for any changes, it is the law. Provide the law that allows for not voting members to sign up for planning or zoning. According the state of Montana in 2023 Census, Condon, MT had a population is 271, with a median age of 62.9 and a median household income of $57,813. Between 2022 and 2023 the population of Condon, MT declined from 307 to 271, a −11.7% decrease. If this is true the mailing list must have included none resident in it. Please, let us see the mailing list! included in the planning process addresses and details of how many returns undeliverable mailings. Jurisdiction, meeting notices and quorum should come first then we see what the community has to say about the enrichment of the 501c3 Stewards of the swan. Once again Provide the mailing lists for the notice. Remove do all meetings that didn’t have a quorum. on Facebook Share First and foremost ''I am speaking for myself in my personal capacity on this matter" I believe we should look at the 2018 plan and why it failed. It appears the 2018 map covers areas outside the Condon Community Council's jurisdiction also improperly posting meeting times and minimum dates appears 2 and 3 day notice of meetings throut the entire process. The main violates are utilizing meeting materials from meeting with no quorum seem to be the case again here. My main question is are we going down the same road. Simple answer is YES! The 10.4 mile and at most has 285 people. As I see it we should address this issue with disclosure of the mailing list. Also before we move forward with documents from Null andvoid meeting materials be advised this is a crimeit Montana. None residents of this area can not vote for any changes, it is the law. Provide the law that allows for not voting members to sign up for planning or zoning. According the state of Montana in 2023 Census, Condon, MT had a population is 271, with a median age of 62.9 and a median household income of $57,813. Between 2022 and 2023 the population of Condon, MT declined from 307 to 271, a −11.7% decrease. If this is true the mailing list must have included none resident in it. Please, let us see the mailing list! included in the planning process addresses and details of how many returns undeliverable mailings. Jurisdiction, meeting notices and quorum should come first then we see what the community has to say about the enrichment of the 501c3 Stewards of the swan. Once again Provide the mailing lists for the notice. Remove do all meetings that didn’t have a quorum. on Twitter Share First and foremost ''I am speaking for myself in my personal capacity on this matter" I believe we should look at the 2018 plan and why it failed. It appears the 2018 map covers areas outside the Condon Community Council's jurisdiction also improperly posting meeting times and minimum dates appears 2 and 3 day notice of meetings throut the entire process. The main violates are utilizing meeting materials from meeting with no quorum seem to be the case again here. My main question is are we going down the same road. Simple answer is YES! The 10.4 mile and at most has 285 people. As I see it we should address this issue with disclosure of the mailing list. Also before we move forward with documents from Null andvoid meeting materials be advised this is a crimeit Montana. None residents of this area can not vote for any changes, it is the law. Provide the law that allows for not voting members to sign up for planning or zoning. According the state of Montana in 2023 Census, Condon, MT had a population is 271, with a median age of 62.9 and a median household income of $57,813. Between 2022 and 2023 the population of Condon, MT declined from 307 to 271, a −11.7% decrease. If this is true the mailing list must have included none resident in it. Please, let us see the mailing list! included in the planning process addresses and details of how many returns undeliverable mailings. Jurisdiction, meeting notices and quorum should come first then we see what the community has to say about the enrichment of the 501c3 Stewards of the swan. Once again Provide the mailing lists for the notice. Remove do all meetings that didn’t have a quorum. on Linkedin Email First and foremost ''I am speaking for myself in my personal capacity on this matter" I believe we should look at the 2018 plan and why it failed. It appears the 2018 map covers areas outside the Condon Community Council's jurisdiction also improperly posting meeting times and minimum dates appears 2 and 3 day notice of meetings throut the entire process. The main violates are utilizing meeting materials from meeting with no quorum seem to be the case again here. My main question is are we going down the same road. Simple answer is YES! The 10.4 mile and at most has 285 people. As I see it we should address this issue with disclosure of the mailing list. Also before we move forward with documents from Null andvoid meeting materials be advised this is a crimeit Montana. None residents of this area can not vote for any changes, it is the law. Provide the law that allows for not voting members to sign up for planning or zoning. According the state of Montana in 2023 Census, Condon, MT had a population is 271, with a median age of 62.9 and a median household income of $57,813. Between 2022 and 2023 the population of Condon, MT declined from 307 to 271, a −11.7% decrease. If this is true the mailing list must have included none resident in it. Please, let us see the mailing list! included in the planning process addresses and details of how many returns undeliverable mailings. Jurisdiction, meeting notices and quorum should come first then we see what the community has to say about the enrichment of the 501c3 Stewards of the swan. Once again Provide the mailing lists for the notice. Remove do all meetings that didn’t have a quorum. link

First and foremost ''I am speaking for myself in my personal capacity on this matter" I believe we should look at the 2018 plan and why it failed. It appears the 2018 map covers areas outside the Condon Community Council's jurisdiction also improperly posting meeting times and minimum dates appears 2 and 3 day notice of meetings throut the entire process. The main violates are utilizing meeting materials from meeting with no quorum seem to be the case again here. My main question is are we going down the same road. Simple answer is YES! The 10.4 mile and at most has 285 people. As I see it we should address this issue with disclosure of the mailing list. Also before we move forward with documents from Null andvoid meeting materials be advised this is a crimeit Montana. None residents of this area can not vote for any changes, it is the law. Provide the law that allows for not voting members to sign up for planning or zoning. According the state of Montana in 2023 Census, Condon, MT had a population is 271, with a median age of 62.9 and a median household income of $57,813. Between 2022 and 2023 the population of Condon, MT declined from 307 to 271, a −11.7% decrease. If this is true the mailing list must have included none resident in it. Please, let us see the mailing list! included in the planning process addresses and details of how many returns undeliverable mailings. Jurisdiction, meeting notices and quorum should come first then we see what the community has to say about the enrichment of the 501c3 Stewards of the swan. Once again Provide the mailing lists for the notice. Remove do all meetings that didn’t have a quorum.

Edward Klassen asked 16 days ago

The statistics for the plan reflect the Swan Valley. For the US Census, Condon is a smaller geographical area than the Swan Valley. Condon’s Census Designated Place encompasses a stretch of Highway 83 between Swanland Drive and Kauffman Rd. It doesn’t include populated areas around Holland Lake, Lindberg Lake, Pierce Lake, among others. The demographics data is consistent with the Swan Valley census boundary.
Share The entire year and a half I tried to get you to fallow the laws for open meetings. Voting without required quorum and to redo meetings that were Null and void. Yet despite the meeting and all actions at the 25th Sept meetings being null and void you intend advance the illegal documents. You were required to nullify all business conducted at the offensive meeting, Remove all planning documents and conduct the meeting again legally. If you intend to use those documents I will have no choice but to move forward with an MCA 45-7-208 case before the County Commissioners and State Attorney. (Tampering with Public Records): Criminalizes knowingly making false entries, using false documents, or destroying records; penalties can be severe (up to 10 yrs prison/fine.) Correcting the problem is simple have the community council members reestablish the committee and conduct the meeting then follow established rules for meeting notices and quorum. on Facebook Share The entire year and a half I tried to get you to fallow the laws for open meetings. Voting without required quorum and to redo meetings that were Null and void. Yet despite the meeting and all actions at the 25th Sept meetings being null and void you intend advance the illegal documents. You were required to nullify all business conducted at the offensive meeting, Remove all planning documents and conduct the meeting again legally. If you intend to use those documents I will have no choice but to move forward with an MCA 45-7-208 case before the County Commissioners and State Attorney. (Tampering with Public Records): Criminalizes knowingly making false entries, using false documents, or destroying records; penalties can be severe (up to 10 yrs prison/fine.) Correcting the problem is simple have the community council members reestablish the committee and conduct the meeting then follow established rules for meeting notices and quorum. on Twitter Share The entire year and a half I tried to get you to fallow the laws for open meetings. Voting without required quorum and to redo meetings that were Null and void. Yet despite the meeting and all actions at the 25th Sept meetings being null and void you intend advance the illegal documents. You were required to nullify all business conducted at the offensive meeting, Remove all planning documents and conduct the meeting again legally. If you intend to use those documents I will have no choice but to move forward with an MCA 45-7-208 case before the County Commissioners and State Attorney. (Tampering with Public Records): Criminalizes knowingly making false entries, using false documents, or destroying records; penalties can be severe (up to 10 yrs prison/fine.) Correcting the problem is simple have the community council members reestablish the committee and conduct the meeting then follow established rules for meeting notices and quorum. on Linkedin Email The entire year and a half I tried to get you to fallow the laws for open meetings. Voting without required quorum and to redo meetings that were Null and void. Yet despite the meeting and all actions at the 25th Sept meetings being null and void you intend advance the illegal documents. You were required to nullify all business conducted at the offensive meeting, Remove all planning documents and conduct the meeting again legally. If you intend to use those documents I will have no choice but to move forward with an MCA 45-7-208 case before the County Commissioners and State Attorney. (Tampering with Public Records): Criminalizes knowingly making false entries, using false documents, or destroying records; penalties can be severe (up to 10 yrs prison/fine.) Correcting the problem is simple have the community council members reestablish the committee and conduct the meeting then follow established rules for meeting notices and quorum. link

The entire year and a half I tried to get you to fallow the laws for open meetings. Voting without required quorum and to redo meetings that were Null and void. Yet despite the meeting and all actions at the 25th Sept meetings being null and void you intend advance the illegal documents. You were required to nullify all business conducted at the offensive meeting, Remove all planning documents and conduct the meeting again legally. If you intend to use those documents I will have no choice but to move forward with an MCA 45-7-208 case before the County Commissioners and State Attorney. (Tampering with Public Records): Criminalizes knowingly making false entries, using false documents, or destroying records; penalties can be severe (up to 10 yrs prison/fine.) Correcting the problem is simple have the community council members reestablish the committee and conduct the meeting then follow established rules for meeting notices and quorum.

Edward Klassen asked 21 days ago

Thank you for your comment.
Share The Montana Land Use Planning Act is only mandatory for a municipality with a population of at or exceeding 5,000 in a county of 70000 or more. As a Missoula County planner you know those requirements are met. You also know for two years said it was required by law to update the plan. We know that was a lie. We also know the law requires that any and all business conducted in an illegal meeting can NOT be used. It is disingenuous to say you do not have either vote again with a quorum present or not use any of the illicit materials. Re-do all meetings as required by law! on Facebook Share The Montana Land Use Planning Act is only mandatory for a municipality with a population of at or exceeding 5,000 in a county of 70000 or more. As a Missoula County planner you know those requirements are met. You also know for two years said it was required by law to update the plan. We know that was a lie. We also know the law requires that any and all business conducted in an illegal meeting can NOT be used. It is disingenuous to say you do not have either vote again with a quorum present or not use any of the illicit materials. Re-do all meetings as required by law! on Twitter Share The Montana Land Use Planning Act is only mandatory for a municipality with a population of at or exceeding 5,000 in a county of 70000 or more. As a Missoula County planner you know those requirements are met. You also know for two years said it was required by law to update the plan. We know that was a lie. We also know the law requires that any and all business conducted in an illegal meeting can NOT be used. It is disingenuous to say you do not have either vote again with a quorum present or not use any of the illicit materials. Re-do all meetings as required by law! on Linkedin Email The Montana Land Use Planning Act is only mandatory for a municipality with a population of at or exceeding 5,000 in a county of 70000 or more. As a Missoula County planner you know those requirements are met. You also know for two years said it was required by law to update the plan. We know that was a lie. We also know the law requires that any and all business conducted in an illegal meeting can NOT be used. It is disingenuous to say you do not have either vote again with a quorum present or not use any of the illicit materials. Re-do all meetings as required by law! link

The Montana Land Use Planning Act is only mandatory for a municipality with a population of at or exceeding 5,000 in a county of 70000 or more. As a Missoula County planner you know those requirements are met. You also know for two years said it was required by law to update the plan. We know that was a lie. We also know the law requires that any and all business conducted in an illegal meeting can NOT be used. It is disingenuous to say you do not have either vote again with a quorum present or not use any of the illicit materials. Re-do all meetings as required by law!

Edward Klassen asked 21 days ago

The Montana Land Use Planning Act is only mandatory for a municipality with a population of at or exceeding 5,000. Missoula County is not a municipality; it is a county.

Page last updated: 30 Jan 2026, 04:30 PM

Swan Valley Planning Committee

Have a question about what the Swan Valley Planning Committee is working on? Ask us!

No zoning period

Please remove Zoning from the plan.

The subcommittee didn't have the Quran as required by law thus no legal vote was taken. They had 19 meeting that failed to post agendas in a timely manner or have a proper legal quorum! Pplease provide the law that allows you to use documents for illicit illegal Null and void meetings.

I have presented your agencies the missing meet minutes. You have not posted them as required by law. Please do so!

Signup Banner

Upcoming Meetings

Documents

Past Meeting Agendas

Meeting Minutes

Who's Listening

Follow Project